ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
'Traumatic to Say the Least; It Still Affects Me': Consumer Perspectives on Community Treatment Orders in Australia.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunity Treatment Orders (CTOs) are contested practices in mental healthcare due to unresolved evidence of effectiveness and persistent human rights concerns. Despite this, Australia has high rates of CTO use internationally. Research from a lived and living experience (LLE) perspective remains limited.
methodsThis mixed methods research explored experiences of people with LLE of mental ill-health and being on a CTO ('consumers'). An online survey including Likert-rated, categorical and open-ended questions was disseminated across Australia in 2024 to consumers aged 18 years or over. Quantitative data were reported descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed using Latent Content Analysis.
resultsForty-three people completed the survey; most identified as female (86%); 51.2% were aged 30-49 years; 7.2% were currently on a CTO; 40.5% had been on a CTO in the past 1-5 years; and 45.2% had been on a CTO more than once. Automated data contamination ('bot') infiltration hampered inclusion of further data. Participant responses included: (1) experiences prior to being on a CTO; (2) experiences whilst on a CTO; (3) attitudes towards CTOs; (4) family involvement; and (5) views on mental health services. While some consumers reported experiencing positive care, many rejected use of CTOs, reporting coercion, exclusion from decision-making and information, lack of alternative support options, and lack of compassion.
conclusionsPolicy and practice reforms, including focus on recovery and human rights, appear to have failed to improve experiences of CTOs. Further work to close the policy-practice gap and translate policy into more inclusive, human rights-based care is indicated. LIVED EXPERIENCE OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: This project has included considerable involvement and community engagement with people with lived and living experience ('LLE') of CTOs and/or mental health service use in all phases of the project. The project includes two Chief Investigators who identify as LLE leaders and researchers (VE and SL), and who have direct lived experience of CTOs, or as a family/caregiver of individuals who have direct lived experience of CTOs. The project manager (TZ) and some project staff (TS, TK, and PS) are LLE researchers, and the project is guided by a Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) with LLE experience of CTOs, including both service users and family/caregivers. We also have LLE experts on our project's international advisory panel. Together, their contributions have been vital in the project team's open and transparent reflections on their diverse perspectives and positioning which have grounded the project's focus on LLE perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.