Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42466878›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

'Traumatic to Say the Least; It Still Affects Me': Consumer Perspectives on Community Treatment Orders in Australia.

Sharon Lawn, Tessa-May Zirnsak, T J Spencer, Elaine Waddell, Jane Fischer, Tarmia Klass, Puneet Sansanwal, Edwina T Light, Vrinda Edan, Chris Maylea and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sharon LawnCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5464-8887
Tessa-May ZirnsakDepartment of Community and Clinical Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5768-0594
T J SpencerDepartment of Community and Clinical Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8962-9877
Elaine WaddellCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jane FischerCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9631-4685
Tarmia KlassCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-7676
Puneet SansanwalDepartment of Community and Clinical Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4290-5102
Edwina T LightUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2195-7146
Vrinda EdanMedicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chris MayleaLaw School, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3688-0487
Penelope WellerSchool of Law, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Morgan GouldDepartment of Community and Clinical Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Christopher J RyanDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-9427
Giles Newton-HowesDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Steve KiselySchool of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4021-2924
Lisa BrophyDepartment of Community and Clinical Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6460-3490

Funding

Australian Research Council DP230100967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity Treatment Orders (CTOs) are contested practices in mental healthcare due to unresolved evidence of effectiveness and persistent human rights concerns. Despite this, Australia has high rates of CTO use internationally. Research from a lived and living experience (LLE) perspective remains limited.

methodsThis mixed methods research explored experiences of people with LLE of mental ill-health and being on a CTO ('consumers'). An online survey including Likert-rated, categorical and open-ended questions was disseminated across Australia in 2024 to consumers aged 18 years or over. Quantitative data were reported descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed using Latent Content Analysis.

resultsForty-three people completed the survey; most identified as female (86%); 51.2% were aged 30-49 years; 7.2% were currently on a CTO; 40.5% had been on a CTO in the past 1-5 years; and 45.2% had been on a CTO more than once. Automated data contamination ('bot') infiltration hampered inclusion of further data. Participant responses included: (1) experiences prior to being on a CTO; (2) experiences whilst on a CTO; (3) attitudes towards CTOs; (4) family involvement; and (5) views on mental health services. While some consumers reported experiencing positive care, many rejected use of CTOs, reporting coercion, exclusion from decision-making and information, lack of alternative support options, and lack of compassion.

conclusionsPolicy and practice reforms, including focus on recovery and human rights, appear to have failed to improve experiences of CTOs. Further work to close the policy-practice gap and translate policy into more inclusive, human rights-based care is indicated. LIVED EXPERIENCE OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: This project has included considerable involvement and community engagement with people with lived and living experience ('LLE') of CTOs and/or mental health service use in all phases of the project. The project includes two Chief Investigators who identify as LLE leaders and researchers (VE and SL), and who have direct lived experience of CTOs, or as a family/caregiver of individuals who have direct lived experience of CTOs. The project manager (TZ) and some project staff (TS, TK, and PS) are LLE researchers, and the project is guided by a Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) with LLE experience of CTOs, including both service users and family/caregivers. We also have LLE experts on our project's international advisory panel. Together, their contributions have been vital in the project team's open and transparent reflections on their diverse perspectives and positioning which have grounded the project's focus on LLE perspectives.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesMental DisordersAdolescentAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcoercioncommunity treatment ordersmental healthmental health servicesorganisational culturesevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID42466878
PMCPMC13378099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.