Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42466825›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2026

Systems-Based Dialogue With Secondary School Students to Explore School Food Environments That Promote Healthy People and Planet.

Sarah Browne, Aoife Dooley, Eamon Lovett, Aisling Ní Fhionnghalaigh, Aideen O'Neill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah BrowneDietetics, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Health Sciences Centre, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8208-2932
Aoife DooleyDietetics, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Health Sciences Centre, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Eamon LovettDietetics, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Health Sciences Centre, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Aisling Ní FhionnghalaighDietetics, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Health Sciences Centre, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Aideen O'NeillDietetics, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Health Sciences Centre, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe quality of food environments in secondary schools in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) varies depending on local practices. Funding for free hot school meals recently increased significantly with phased implementation and priority for universal access in primary schools and among 'disadvantaged' status schools at the secondary level. Engagement with students, in the context of rapidly changing school food policies, is lacking. This study explored students' views about the food environment in secondary schools using a system-based approach and identified student priorities for actions and policies to support school food environments that are healthy for people and planet.

methodsA cross-sectional qualitative study design using participatory methods was used. Public secondary schools were recruited in 2023 and 2024. Fourth year students volunteered to participate in one CO-CREATE Dialogue Forum per school on the idea: How to make our school food environment better for our health and the planet? Data were analysed using content analysis. The systems-based action scales model was applied to categorise students' recommendations for a desired system.

resultsSixty-two students (55% female) aged 15-17 years in eight schools (including four schools designated 'disadvantaged' status) participated in dialogue forums. Issues with time, space and mealtime infrastructure were reported by students. Dissatisfaction with food quality and lack of variety were reported by some. Practices that identify students accessing free school meals risk perpetuating stigma. Food and packaging waste and catering for diverse food cultures and health needs were students' primary concerns from a planetary health perspective, with a small minority suggesting more plant-based food options. Limited opportunities to influence school food were reported. In the desired system, food choice, taste and quality, food and packaging waste, adequate spaces to eat and socialise, improved break-time logistics (e.g., food ordering system, time available, queue systems), and structures for participation and influence were priorities for students.

conclusionThe CO-CREATE Dialogue Forum was an effective method for exploring school food, with students demonstrating systems thinking ability in considering a range of factors shaping their environments. Their ideas and solutions are important to inform policy and practice at local school, public health and government levels.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyFood ServicesHealth PromotionSchoolsStudentsAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIrelandMaleNutrition PolicyQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42466825
PMCPMC13378185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.