Observational studyActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2026
Patients With Atypical Symptoms of Depression Respond Better to Lithium Augmentation Than Patients Without Atypical Symptoms.
Observational study in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Atypical depression: state of the art and future perspectives.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionUnderstanding the differences in treatment response between subtypes of major depressive disorder (MDD) may help to prevent lengthy trial-and-error processes by identifying effective treatment options. The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of atypical features of MDD (MDD-A) on the response to lithium augmentation (LA).
methodsIn a multicenter prospective cohort study, response to LA was compared between patients with atypical symptoms of MDD (MDD-A, n = 24) versus patients without atypical symptoms (MDD-nA; n = 94) using a Cox regression analysis.
resultsA total of 62.5% of patients with MDD-A and 36.2% of patients with MDD-nA responded to LA. Analysis adjusted for age, sex, sufficient lithium serum concentration, and symptom severity at baseline showed a significantly higher probability of patients with atypical symptoms to respond to LA (HR 2.20, p = 0.02).
conclusionThis is the first study investigating lithium-response in patients with MDD-A. The MDD-A subtype may help to predict response to LA.
trial registrationEudraCT number: 2008-004182-26; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: DRKS00026205.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.