ArticleAnimal genetics2026
Untangling the Copy Number Variation at the Basis of Belted Phenotypes in Cattle Using Long-Read Sequencing.
Article in Animal genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The belted phenotype in cattle, a distinctive white belt across the midsection observed in breeds such as the Dutch Belted and Belted Galloway, is caused by a copy number variant (CNV) upstream of TWIST2, a gene involved in melanocyte development. While the CNV is necessary for belt formation, the genetic basis of variation in belt width and completeness remains unclear. To refine understanding of these phenotypes, we generated a de novo genome assembly of Dutch Belted cattle and analysed both short- and long-read sequencing data from animals with normal-width, small-width, and incomplete belts. Standard variant calling tools failed to identify the CNV, highlighting technical challenges in detecting large insertions. Instead, coverage analysis and qPCR confirmed the CNV as a 6 kb tandem array approximately 16.5 kb upstream of TWIST2. Long-read evidence showed identical four-copy haplotypes for individuals with normal-width, small-width, and incomplete belts, indicating that CNV copy number does not influence belt width or completeness. Furthermore, no unique variants were detected within the CNV or TWIST2 in a small-width belted individual, suggesting that modifiers affecting belt width likely reside elsewhere in the genome. Genome-wide scans revealed extremely low nucleotide diversity in the CNV region, consistent with a selective sweep driven by strong artificial selection unique to the Dutch Belted breed. Together, these results show that while the CNV is necessary for belt formation, additional modifier loci likely influence belt width and completeness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.