Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42466792›Full record

ArticleAnimal genetics2026

Untangling the Copy Number Variation at the Basis of Belted Phenotypes in Cattle Using Long-Read Sequencing.

Rensco A H Hogers, Mirte Bosse, Annemieke P Rattink, Rayner González-Prendes, Marta Gòdia, Kimberley Laport, Martien A M Groenen, Richard P M A Crooijmans, Aniek C Bouwman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rensco A H HogersAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Gelderland, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9734-5795
Mirte BosseAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Gelderland, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2433-2483
Annemieke P RattinkAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Gelderland, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6474-8977
Rayner González-PrendesAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Gelderland, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3679-4685
Marta GòdiaAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Gelderland, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0439-4014
Kimberley LaportAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Gelderland, the Netherlands.
Martien A M GroenenAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Gelderland, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-4545
Richard P M A CrooijmansAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Gelderland, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8108-9972
Aniek C BouwmanAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Gelderland, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5079-7108

Funding

Wageningen University & Research Knowledge Base Programme KB-34-013-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The belted phenotype in cattle, a distinctive white belt across the midsection observed in breeds such as the Dutch Belted and Belted Galloway, is caused by a copy number variant (CNV) upstream of TWIST2, a gene involved in melanocyte development. While the CNV is necessary for belt formation, the genetic basis of variation in belt width and completeness remains unclear. To refine understanding of these phenotypes, we generated a de novo genome assembly of Dutch Belted cattle and analysed both short- and long-read sequencing data from animals with normal-width, small-width, and incomplete belts. Standard variant calling tools failed to identify the CNV, highlighting technical challenges in detecting large insertions. Instead, coverage analysis and qPCR confirmed the CNV as a 6 kb tandem array approximately 16.5 kb upstream of TWIST2. Long-read evidence showed identical four-copy haplotypes for individuals with normal-width, small-width, and incomplete belts, indicating that CNV copy number does not influence belt width or completeness. Furthermore, no unique variants were detected within the CNV or TWIST2 in a small-width belted individual, suggesting that modifiers affecting belt width likely reside elsewhere in the genome. Genome-wide scans revealed extremely low nucleotide diversity in the CNV region, consistent with a selective sweep driven by strong artificial selection unique to the Dutch Belted breed. Together, these results show that while the CNV is necessary for belt formation, additional modifier loci likely influence belt width and completeness.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsAnimalsCattlePhenotypeSequence Analysis, DNATwist-Related Protein 2Twist-Related Protein 2belted phenotypecattlecopy number variation (CNV)long‐read sequencingselective sweepTWIST2

Identifiers

PMID42466792
PMCPMC13377943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.