ArticleThe clinical teacher2026
PARTNER: A Toolbox for Patient and Public Involvement Governance Within Health Professions Education Research.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The PARTNER framework offers a practical approach to patient and public involvement governance within health professions education research. It has been created by the NIHR-funded Workforce Voices Partnership, drawing on the experience of academics, operations staff and public contributors in establishing PPI panels. Although there is agreement that patient and public involvement matters for health professions education research, there is little accessible guidance regarding the governance required to support it. Governance encompasses the structures, decisions and practical arrangements that enable patient and public involvement to be fair, purposeful and sustainable. This includes logistics but also the principles and expectations that help panels function well. Clearer guidance is needed to enable research teams to move from broad commitments to coproduction of research, towards establishing and maintaining conditions that allow for meaningful, sustainable involvement. The PARTNER framework is built around seven areas of governance. Workforce Voices have found key to facilitating meaningful involvement: (1) payment and recognition; (2) agreement; (3) roles and responsibilities; (4) training and support; (5) networking; (6) equity of recruitment and membership; and (7) review, evaluation and feedback. Each area of the framework is linked to practical tools, templates and tips that can be adapted for readers' own research projects. The aim of this toolbox is to offer a structure for novice or developing researchers to navigate PPI governance with confidence and in a way that promotes meaningful engagement and involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.