Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42466543›Full record

ArticleProteomics. Clinical applications2026

Distinct Functional Signatures of Human Olfactory and Respiratory Mucus Revealed by Proteomics Combined With Machine Learning.

Romain Topalian, Anna Kristina Hernandez, Karoline Lantzsch, Philipp Hubel, Chrystelle Mavoungou, Frank Rosenau, Jens Pfannstiel, Thomas Hummel, Katharina Schindowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomics. Clinical applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Romain TopalianInstitute of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0436-3856
Anna Kristina HernandezSmell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6711-7359
Karoline LantzschSmell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Philipp HubelCore Facility Hohenheim, Mass Spectrometry Unit, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Chrystelle MavoungouInstitute For Applied Biotechnology, Biberach University of Applied Sciences, Biberach, Germany.
Frank RosenauInstitute of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Jens PfannstielCore Facility Hohenheim, Mass Spectrometry Unit, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Thomas HummelSmell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9713-0183
Katharina SchindowskiInstitute For Applied Biotechnology, Biberach University of Applied Sciences, Biberach, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2514-1654

Funding

Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) 915477Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft ZI-1143/HU441European Union's Horizon 2020 956977German Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nasal cavity includestwo distinct epithelial regions: olfactory and respiratory which fulfilldifferent roles. Despite their differences, their mucus composition, however, is yet not well elucidated.

methodsTo analyze themucosal secretome, samples from the human olfactory mucus (OM) and respiratorymucus (RM) were collected in a volunteer study with 25 normosmic individualsand analyzed using label-free quantitative proteomics (LFQ), supervised machinelearning (Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis, PLS-DA), functionalenrichment via Gene Ontology (GO) and pathway analyses at Reactome database.

resultsA total of 1,780high-confidence proteins were quantified across 50 samples. The optimizedPLS-DA model achieved robust discrimination between OM and RM (AUC = 0.93 ±0.04), identifying distinct molecular signatures. Cross-validation across GO,Reactome, and PLS-DA macro-category analyses confirmed the robustness andbiological coherence of these findings.

conclusionsOverall, this study defines twocomplementary mucosal ecosystems: a dynamic olfactory mucus optimized for highmitochondrial activity, (non-motile) ciliary renewal, and autophagy, and animmune-active respiratory mucus specialized in host defense, providing acomprehensive molecular framework of nasal regional specialization.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMucusOlfactory MucosaProteomicsRespiratory MucosaAdultFemaleHumansMalehuman nasal olfactory and respiratory mucusPLS‐DAproteomicsReactome databasesecretome

Identifiers

PMID42466543
PMCPMC13377676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.