ArticleBMJ public health2026
Exploring the acceptability and adherence of the integrated MAMI care pathway for supporting vulnerable infants and their mothers in South Sudan: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: One in four infants is born too small or too early, increasing the risk of poor growth, development, ill health and death. This risk is exacerbated by recurring conflict and climatic shocks. The management of small and nutritionally at-risk infants under 6 months and their mothers (MAMI) care pathway was integrated into primary healthcare to ensure continuous mother-infant-centred care in South Sudan. This study explored the acceptability of the MAMI approach for service providers and users and the factors influencing their adherence. Methods: A qualitative study was embedded in a mixed-methods study following vulnerable mother-infant pairs. MAMI care included sensitisation and screening in the community and health facility, in-depth assessment and risk-based care addressing physical, mental and nutritional vulnerability of infants and mothers. Semi-structured interviews of 20 health workers and 30 mothers explored acceptability and adherence to MAMI care provision and use. Results: Themes of perceived acceptability of MAMI care were mapped across coherence, self-efficacy, affective attitude, burden, ethicality, opportunity cost and perceived effectiveness. Health workers were most apprehensive about the additional workload and time required to implement the care pathway. Mothers expressed concern over the numerous health visits far from their homes and not having supportive family members. Factors promoting adherence to MAMI care provision and use were mapped across capability, opportunity and motivation. Health workers' self-confidence was boosted by the new knowledge and skills they acquired through training and mentorship. Mothers reported learning practical ways to care for their infants independently and to witness the positive impact on their infants' thriving. Conclusions: MAMI care was accepted for addressing the needs of a previously overlooked vulnerable group. Effective integrated MAMI care requires resolving delivery and use gaps and overcoming challenges that undermine adherence from both providers and users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.