ReviewFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026
Cross-subject generalization for EEG emotion recognition: a review of methods, challenges, and future trends.
Review in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-subject emotion recognition based on electroencephalogram (EEG) signals faces significant challenges, mainly because EEG data are highly non-stationary and easily influenced by time, environment, and individual physiological states. Meanwhile, substantial inter-subject variability leads to obvious differences in signal patterns across different people, which makes it difficult for a single model to learn stable and transferable emotional features. As a result, these factors severely hinder model generalization and reduce recognition performance in real-world applications. Unlike previous reviews that categorize methods based on network architectures, this paper proposes a novel taxonomy grounded in the "generalization hypothesis," synthesizing existing approaches into five major paradigms: statistical and adversarial distribution alignment, topological and structural modeling, advanced representation learning, generative modeling and style reconstruction, and multimodal complementary fusion. Our analysis reveals that the core conflict lies in the trade-off between alignment intensity and semantic integrity. Future research should integrate causal representation learning with source-free domain adaptation to realize truly plug-and-play affective brain-computer interfaces (aBCIs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.