SynthesisPublic health reviews2026
Systematic review of initiatives promoting health career paths for secondary-level students.
Synthesis in Public health reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This systematic review examined healthcare career promotional initiatives targeting secondary-level students to characterize initiative types, evaluate their effectiveness at influencing students' knowledge, interest, attitudes, and healthcare career pathways, and identify factors influencing program success. Methods: A pre-registered systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Seven databases were searched. Analysis and interpretation were guided by a modified Motivation-Opportunity-Ability (MOA) model. Study quality was assessed with adapted checklists. Results: Fifty studies with a total of 5,315 participants were included. Forty-four initiatives were North American, targeting grades eleven and twelve through camps, courses, internships, mentorships, and continuum programs. Studies observed short-term improvements in interest, attitudes, knowledge, and career pathways. The success of initiatives was associated with flexibility, accessibility, funding, cultural relevance, and community involvement. Risk of bias assessment was heterogeneous, ranging from moderate to high. Conclusion: Current healthcare career promotional initiatives are promising but constrained by moderate quality, geographical limitation, and heterogeneity. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024515728, identifier CRD42024515728.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.