ArticleJAMIA open2026
DETERIO-LLM: enhancing traditional deterioration risk scores with clinical context and advanced reasoning.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Accurate and timely prediction of physiological deterioration in hospitalized patients is essential, but existing deep learning models, which rely solely on structured electronic health record (EHR) data, generate high false-positive rates by missing crucial contextual information in clinical notes. We present DETERIO-LLM, a hybrid prediction model that selectively integrates large language models (LLMs) with a deep learning model (DETERIO) to reclassify borderline-risk alerts using narrative clinical notes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used a cohort of 1000 inpatients (4.6% deterioration prevalence). DETERIO-LLM selectively analyzed narrative notes for alerts in the uncertainty range (scores 2.5-3.5). Performance was evaluated using sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and F1 score, benchmarked against comparators including the best-established ML model, eCART. Results: DETERIO-LLM significantly improved predictive precision over all comparators. At its optimal threshold, the model achieved a PPV of 30.6% and an F1 score of 37.3%, outperforming eCART. This selective integration reduced false-positive alerts by 46.5% within the uncertainty range while maintaining comparable sensitivity. Discussion: This study demonstrates a practical, interpretable method for integrating LLM-derived contextual knowledge into existing structured EHR prediction workflows. By focusing LLM analysis on high-uncertainty alerts, DETERIO-LLM substantially improves clinical utility through a marked reduction in false-positive cases, which is critical for mitigating alert fatigue. Conclusion: Selective LLM integration with structured EHR models offers a viable, interpretable path to improving early warning systems in clinical care by leveraging narrative context to reduce alert fatigue while enhancing predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.