ArticleResearch square2026
Enrolling and retaining a representative population in the NIH Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER)-Adult Cohort.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
43 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Vulnerable populations are underrepresented in clinical studies. The design of the national RECOVER-Adult cohort study aimed to over-enroll underrepresented populations to ensure the representation of vulnerable populations in the U.S. We quantify and assess follow-up visit completion among a representative population in the RECOVER-Adult cohort. Methods: Between October 2021 and October 2023, we enrolled adult participants across 16 hub-sites in the U.S. Community outreach was used to gather and incorporate feedback prior to and during study implementation. Recruitment methods included electronic and in-person outreach by individuals trained in diversity, equity, and inclusion at health centers, health departments, and community-based organizations, as well as snowball sampling. Study staff maintained regular contact with participants between study visits via phone, email, and text, and arranged free transportation to support attendance. Results: Of the 14,880 adult participants who were enrolled in the RECOVER-Adult Cohort Study, 14,531 participants (mean[SD] age: 47.1[15.5] years, 57.0% Non-Hispanic White, 27.7% Male) completed a baseline visit. Over 85% of participants completed the first four follow-up visits, while over 90% completed a last visit. Across follow-up visits, participants who identified as minoritized groups, younger, LGBTQIA+, had less education, did not speak English, lived in a rural area, and reported a disability were less likely to complete their visits, while older and female participants were more likely to complete them. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that enrollment is more feasible than retaining a sociodemographically-representative study population, highlighting a need for innovative approaches to sustain on-going study participation in the post-pandemic era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.