Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42466402›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Tactile Biofeedback That Targets Stance Time Acutely Modulates Propulsion Mechanics in Healthy Gait.

Christopher Engsberg, Nathaniel Hunt, Philippe Malcolm, Mukul Mukherjee

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher EngsbergUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha.
Nathaniel HuntUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha.
Philippe MalcolmUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha.
Mukul MukherjeeUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha.

Funding

Visual control of locomotion in people with Parkinsons diseaseP20GM109090 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI STERGIOU, NIKOLAOS · 2014 to 2023
$20.5M
Tissue Analysis Core (TAC)P20GM152301 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI Yury Salkovskiy · 2024 to 2026
$8.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109090NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM152301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofeedback is effective in modifying and improving targeted gait parameters in both healthy individuals and those with chronic stroke. However, prior studies have largely focused on the variable targeted by biofeedback and rarely report changes in other gait features. Given the interdependent nature of gait, alterations in one parameter may induce changes in other features. Thus, we aimed to determine whether tactile biofeedback to the plantar surfaces instructing stance time increases would increase propulsive gait features, such as trailing limb angles (TLA), peak propulsive forces, and propulsive impulses. 8 healthy individuals walked with tactile stimulation instructing varying levels of stance time increase targets (small, medium, and large) to one limb at a time. These stance time targets were calculated using symmetry ratios ranging from 0.775-1.225. This feedback instructed subjects to delay their push off, and thus their toe off, after a heel strike. During the large stance time increase feedback target, subjects increased their stance time (0.23 ± 0.02 seconds, p < 0.001), and consequently their TLA (8.1 ± 0.8°, p = 0.001), peak propulsion (8.1 ± 1.1%BW, p = 0.002), and their propulsive impulse (2.9 ± 0.3%BW·s, p = 0.002) compared to no feedback. Stance time changes were significantly correlated to TLA (R

Indexed as

BiofeedbackCoordinationSensoryStimulationTemporalWalking

Identifiers

PMID42466402
PMCPMC13370641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.