ArticleResearch square2026
Tactile Biofeedback That Targets Stance Time Acutely Modulates Propulsion Mechanics in Healthy Gait.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biofeedback is effective in modifying and improving targeted gait parameters in both healthy individuals and those with chronic stroke. However, prior studies have largely focused on the variable targeted by biofeedback and rarely report changes in other gait features. Given the interdependent nature of gait, alterations in one parameter may induce changes in other features. Thus, we aimed to determine whether tactile biofeedback to the plantar surfaces instructing stance time increases would increase propulsive gait features, such as trailing limb angles (TLA), peak propulsive forces, and propulsive impulses. 8 healthy individuals walked with tactile stimulation instructing varying levels of stance time increase targets (small, medium, and large) to one limb at a time. These stance time targets were calculated using symmetry ratios ranging from 0.775-1.225. This feedback instructed subjects to delay their push off, and thus their toe off, after a heel strike. During the large stance time increase feedback target, subjects increased their stance time (0.23 ± 0.02 seconds, p < 0.001), and consequently their TLA (8.1 ± 0.8°, p = 0.001), peak propulsion (8.1 ± 1.1%BW, p = 0.002), and their propulsive impulse (2.9 ± 0.3%BW·s, p = 0.002) compared to no feedback. Stance time changes were significantly correlated to TLA (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.