ArticleResearch square2026
Implementation and student outcomes of an implementation strategy for the sustainability of group evidence-based practices in schools.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04869657 (Sustainment of Mental Health Supports in Under-Resourced Urban Schools), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sustainment of Mental Health Supports in Under-Resourced Urban Schools
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Limited research has examined the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of training strategies to sustain mental health evidence-based practices (EBPs) in urban elementary schools. Methods: We conducted a hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trial comparing Prepare for Sustainment (PFS)-school district coach supervision of implementers supported by external consultants-to Sustainment as Usual (SAU), which relied on coach supervision alone. Two EBPs were implemented: the Coping Power Program (CPP) for externalizing problems and CBT for Anxiety Treatment in Schools (CATS) for anxiety. The study included three phases: full support (Phase 1), reduced support (Phase 2), and no support (Phase 3). Participants included 40 master's-level implementers, two district coaches, and 435 K-8 students. Outcomes included content and process fidelity, service penetration, mental health symptoms (parent and student report), and academic engagement with learning (teacher report). We also examined implementers' perceptions of training. Results: PFS implementers demonstrated stronger process fidelity: greater engagement with students in Phase 2 and warmer, clearer, and more organized treatment delivery in Phase 3. Content fidelity and service penetration did not differ between conditions in either phase. PFS showed medium and small effect-size improvement on student behavioral and emotional engagement with learning in Phase 2, and a large effect size in behavioral engagement and a medium effect-size improvement in behavioral disaffection with learning in Phase 3 compared to SAU. Students receiving CPP in Phase 2 in the PFS condition demonstrated a large improvement on self-reported externalizing behavior, and students receiving CATS in Phase 2 showed a medium-size reduction in internalizing symptoms relative to students in SAU. Qualitative data showed that implementers who did not receive support from coaches desired supervision on effective EBP delivery, and those experiencing reduced support wanted more frequent guidance. Administrators noted that ongoing collaboration with district coaches would have enhanced their ability to support implementers. Conclusion: A sustainment strategy consisting of an initial training for implementers and occasional consultation for school district coaches is effective for achieving high process fidelity and medium to large effects for engagement with learning activities and mental health outcomes compared to a sustainment as usual strategy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04869657. Registered May 3, 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.