ArticleResearch square2026
Four-year outcomes from an HIV research pathway program for aspiring scientists at the University of California, San Francisco Center for AIDS Research.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Persistent inequities in the biomedical research workforce highlight the need for early, sustained training approaches that support individuals from backgrounds historically underrepresented in science and medicine. We present results of a 4-year evaluation of an HIV mentored research program for pre-doctoral students from colleges in the San Francisco Bay Area. Methods: The Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) Scholars Program took place at the University of California, San Francisco from 2022-2025. We conducted an evaluation across four cohorts of scholars (n = 23) before and after each year of the program. Scholars were individually mentored by a CFAR investigator, completed an independent research project, attended weekly didactic HIV seminars, and participated in professional development activities, along with clinical and community shadowing. We implemented pre- and post-program surveys to assess research skills, confidence, career clarity, program experiences, and mentorship quality each year. Qualitative data were collected through scholar focus groups and in-depth interviews with faculty mentors. Results: Across cohorts, scholars demonstrated consistent gains in research readiness, understanding of scientific processes, tolerance for research challenges, and clarity about their career paths. The proportion of scholars reporting high confidence in pursuing academic work increased from 52.2% to 86.4%, and interest in HIV research increased from 30.4% to 68.2%. All scholars reported a clear understanding of what a career scientist's job entails, which was a significant improvement from baseline. Qualitative findings highlighted the central role of responsive and engaged mentorship, structured programming, and a strong sense of belonging within an HIV research community. Conclusions: Over four years, the UCSF CFAR Scholars Program showed sustained feasibility and a large impact in strengthening research skills, scientific identity, and HIV career interest among early-stage trainees. These findings support early mentored research pathways as an effective strategy to diversify and strengthen the HIV research workforce.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.