Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42466382›Full record

ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2026

Persistent executive, visuospatial, and conceptual deficits after right posterior cerebellar infarction.

Daisuke Yoshioka, Yuji Higaki, Masaaki Iwata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daisuke YoshiokaDepartment of Psychiatry Yowa Hospital Tottori Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9775-2369
Yuji HigakiDepartment of Neurology Yowa Hospital Tottori Japan.
Masaaki IwataDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Tottori University Tottori Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The cerebellum has traditionally been regarded as a structure primarily involved in motor coordination. However, accumulating evidence indicates that the cerebellum can exert substantial influence on cognitive and emotional processes. These findings suggest that the cerebellum may play a broader role in higher-order cognitive functions than previously recognized. Case Presentation: A right-handed Japanese man in his 80s with no significant prior medical history developed cognitive and behavioral symptoms following an infarction involving the right posterior cerebellar lobe and vermis, corresponding to the right posterior inferior cerebellar artery territory. Emotional lability, disorientation, and memory impairment emerged during the subacute phase but gradually improved. In contrast, executive dysfunction, perseveration, and visuospatial impairment persisted. On the Clock Drawing Test, errors such as misplacement of numbers and incorrect representation of time were observed, which could not be explained by visuospatial deficits and suggested impairment of conceptual aspects of cognition. Conclusion: This case demonstrates that a right posterior cerebellar infarction can result in persistent impairments in executive, visuospatial, and conceptual functions. These findings suggest that cerebellar injury may affect higher-order cognition not only through disruption of cerebello-cerebral connectivity, but also through impairment of the cerebellum's modulatory role in the regulation of complex cognitive operations.

Indexed as

cerebellar cognitive affective syndromecerebellar infarctioncognitive dysfunctionconceptual deficitsposterior inferior cerebellar artery

Identifiers

PMID42466382
PMCPMC13373931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.