ReviewIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
Routinization in Nursing Care: An Integrated Review.
Review in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is growing evidence that routinization in nursing care is a concerning issue that directly affects the quality of nursing care and nurses' ability to be creative and innovative in care, flexibility, and ability to provide individualized care, and comprehensiveness in care at the global level. This study aimed to identify factors associated with routinization in nursing care. Materials and Methods: The method of Whittemore and Knafl was employed to conduct this integrated review, which consisted of five stages: identification and determination of the purpose, search for sources, data evaluation, data analysis, and results presentation. Evidence search was conducted using the keywords nursing care, routine, routines, routinization, and their Persian equivalents separately or in combination using the AND and OR operators in the databases PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, SID, Medex, Magiran, and IranDoc from the beginning to October 2024. After screening and checking for eligibility, the articles were evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools. Results: A total of 23 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. The most important factors affecting routinization were categorized into 4 categories: individual factors, organizational factors, communication factors, and patient-related factors. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate the need for critical interventions to address factors that can influence routinization in nursing care. Overall, studies highlight the complexity and dependence of routinization in care on various factors, including workload, work environment, and nurse characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.