Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42466284›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research

Construction of a Predictive Model for Theory and Practical Performance in '

Rui Lin Li, Yi Lan, Ye Fen Han, Hong Xia Lan, Dan Dan Chen, Wen Ting Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rui Lin LiFaculty of Nursing, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yi LanFaculty of Nursing, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Ye Fen HanFaculty of Nursing, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Hong Xia LanFaculty of Nursing, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Dan Dan ChenFaculty of Nursing, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Wen Ting JiangFaculty of Nursing, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Materials and Methods: Machine learning techniques were applied to develop predictive models using data from undergraduate nursing students who enrolled the 2019 and 2020 cohorts. Demographic and learning behavior variables were collected and divided into training and testing sets (7:3 ratio). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used for feature selection, and logistic regression identified independent risk factors. Five algorithms [Logit, RF, XGBoost, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine (SVM)] were used to construct models. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), specificity, and sensitivity. Results: Data from 527 students were analyzed; 59 (11.19%) failed the theoretical exam, and 116 (22.01%) failed the practical exam. Predictors for practical exam included height, comprehensive assessment scores, periodic exam scores, comprehensive practical training scores, and practice frequency. Predictors for the theoretical exam included gender, research participation, academic background, height, periodic exam, and practice frequency. SVM showed the best performance for practical exams prediction (AUC = 0.737), while XGB performed best for theoretical exams (AUC = 0.833). No statistically significant differences in AUC were found between most models ( Conclusions: Height, assessment scores, training engagement, exam results, gender, and practice frequency significantly influenced nursing students' academic outcomes. These findings support personalized teaching strategies in foundational nursing education.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencebehaviornursing educationnursing studentspredictive models

Identifiers

PMID42466284
PMCPMC13375178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.