Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42466265›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2026

Coping mechanisms adopted following a suicide attempt among refugees in humanitarian settings within northern Uganda.

Moses Mukasa, Roscoe Kasujja, Benjamin Alipanga, Gwendolyn Portzky, Wouter Vanderplasschen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Moses MukasaSpecial Needs, Ghent University, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5110-1092
Roscoe KasujjaMakerere University, Uganda.
Benjamin AlipangaDepartment of Mental Health and Community Psychology, Makerere University, Uganda.
Gwendolyn PortzkyMakerere University College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Uganda.
Wouter VanderplasschenGhent University, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most suicides happen following maladaptive coping among suicide survivors; however, coping mechanisms adopted by refugee suicide survivors, especially in Uganda, have hardly been studied. This study assessed the coping mechanisms adopted following suicide attempts among refugees in humanitarian settings in Northern Uganda. A concurrent mixed-methods design was used to study adult refugee-suicide survivors of South Sudanese origin. They were consecutively sampled across four settlements and engaged in structured, in-depth interviews. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 25 using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Fewer than a quarter (17%) of suicide attempts were coped with adaptively. Most refugees coped emotionally by rarely accepting sympathy and understanding (37.5%), frequently trying to keep their feelings to themselves (50.0%), self-blame (50.0%), self-isolation (62.5%), making a plan to act (37.5%), bursting out in anger and other emotions (75.0%), and having fantasies or wishes about how things might turn out (62.5%). These coping mechanisms were congruent with those identified in the qualitative exploration. Refugees in Northern Uganda with a history of suicide attempts maladaptively cope with that history, implying that they could be at high risk of repeated suicide attempts and potentially suicide, based on evidence shown in previous studies.

Indexed as

coping mechanismsRefugeesRefugees of South Sudanese originsuicide attemptSuicide survivors Northern Uganda

Identifiers

PMID42466265
PMCPMC13373283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.