ArticleThe British journal of cardiology2025
Auditing CV risk assessment of inpatients with acute high-risk chest pain: room for improvement?
Article in The British journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) is accepted as a causal risk factor for development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). In individuals aged 40-75 years, reducing LDL-C constitutes a main treatment target for prevention of atherosclerotic CVD in all international guidelines. Furthermore, diabetes mellitus (DM) confers a two-fold excess risk of vascular outcomes (coronary heart disease, ischaemic stroke, and vascular deaths), independent of other risk factors. Our audit project identified a deficit in current standards following an audit of adherence to lipid profile and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) testing in the high-risk chest pain population in our city hospital setting. We found only 49% of patients had LDL-C checked during their inpatient stay, and only 45% had HbA1c checked, of our targeted 100% of patients. This allowed the introduction of a planned intervention to improve admission testing and re-auditing demonstrated an improvement in testing, mainly driven by improved LDL-C testing. Despite this, a deficit still exists and more work is needed to meet our target of 100% compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.