ArticleEuropean journal of case reports in internal medicine2026
Isolated Cytomegalovirus Optic Neuritis in an Immunocompetent Patient.
Article in European journal of case reports in internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) typically causes asymptomatic or mild, self-limiting infections in immunocompetent individuals. Severe end-organ disease, particularly isolated central nervous system or ocular involvement, is associated with significant immunosuppression. Isolated optic neuritis due to CMV in a healthy, immunocompetent host is a rare clinical entity, which can lead to delayed diagnosis and potential vision loss. Case description: We report a rare case of a previously healthy 25-year-old male who presented with a 3-day history of intermittent right retrobulbar pain and was found to have early bilateral optic disc oedema. Best-corrected visual acuity was 9/10 in the right eye, with normal colour vision and no relative afferent pupillary defect. An extensive neurological, immunological, and infectious disease workup was negative for autoimmune and demyelinating conditions. However, serological testing revealed positive immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G titres for CMV. Concurrent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing detected CMV viremia in both blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), confirming an active CMV infection with central nervous system involvement. The patient was treated with high-dose intravenous corticosteroids and systemic antiviral therapy with valganciclovir leading to a complete clinical and anatomical recovery and no clinical relapse during the follow-up period. Conclusion: This case highlights that severe CMV neuroretinal manifestations can occur in strictly immunocompetent patients. Prompt molecular diagnostic testing, specifically CSF and blood PCR, is crucial when atypical optic neuritis is encountered. A combined regimen of antiviral therapy and high-dose corticosteroids represents a highly effective, organ-saving approach for managing CMV-induced optic neuritis. LEARNING POINTS: Cytomegalovirus must be included in the differential diagnosis of acute optic neuritis and bilateral optic disc oedema, even in young, strictly immunocompetent patients without concurrent retinitis or prior immunosuppression.The utilization of polymerase chain reaction to detect viral copies in both blood and cerebrospinal fluid is essential for confirming active systemic and central nervous system viral involvement.The management of viral optic neuritis may necessitate a dual pharmacological strategy. High-dose corticosteroids are crucial to rapidly suppress tissue-damaging inflammation behind an intact blood-brain barrier, while systemic antiviral therapy is required to eradicate the underlying viral load and prevent clinical relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.