Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42466166›Full record

ReviewJournal of human immunity2026

Implementing calculated globulin screening for immunodeficiencies: The benefits and challenges.

Stephen Jolles, Cecilia Poli, Nicholas L Rider, Gabriela Negritu, Til Rendschmidt, Antonio Condino-Neto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human immunity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen JollesImmunodeficiency Centre for Wales, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7394-6804
Cecilia PoliProgram of Immunogenetics and Translational Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6817-0573
Nicholas L RiderDepartment of Health Systems & Implementation Science Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Allergy-Immunology, The Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2549-0678
Gabriela NegrituCSL AG, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6639-4604
Til RendschmidtCSL GmbH, Marburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5801-0571
Antonio Condino-NetoJeffrey Modell Diagnostic and Research Center, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1069-3117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need for pragmatic and cost-effective methodologies to facilitate earlier diagnosis of patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies, who often experience diagnostic delays that impact their quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. This review article will consider the utility of calculated globulin (CG) as a simple and unbiased screening tool for immunodeficiencies. We review literature indicating that CG can serve as an inexpensive and routinely performed proxy for immunoglobulin levels due to their established correlation. We also set out a workflow for the implementation of CG into clinical practice and discuss optimal approaches to embedding into laboratory reporting systems, and integration of AI approaches could expedite diagnoses. Finally, we discuss the challenges and pitfalls of CG screening, including the need for established CG cutoffs/action values across different patient age cohorts. Collaboration among biochemistry and immunology laboratories, clinicians, and patient organizations will be required to manage the logistics of effective broader implementation of CG screening into clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID42466166
PMCPMC13374526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.