ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Inappropriate Viral Testing within the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Emergency Medicine's Choosing Wisely Campaign includes recommendations discouraging comprehensive viral panel testing in children with suspected respiratory viral illness. In the year preceding project implementation, our free-standing pediatric emergency department (PED) ordered comprehensive respiratory pathogen panels (RPPs) in 11.9% of all visits, and 50% of those lacked a clinical indication. This project aimed to reduce the percentage of PED visits with RPP orders from 11.9% to 9% over a 6-month viral respiratory season. Methods: We conducted four major interventions over 2 plan-do-study-act cycles. Interventions included developing a clinical guideline for viral testing, performing provider education, introducing a narrower-spectrum Quad (influenza A/B, COVID-19, and respiratory syncytial virus) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, and adding an order-entry indication requirement for RPPs, which also served as a just-in-time educational tool for providers. We tracked data via a clinical dashboard and through periodic chart reviews. Results: Of the 43,283 patient visits during the project period, the percentage of PED RPP orders decreased from 11.9% at baseline to 6.8% during the intervention period and remained at 6.8% in the following respiratory season. The project had sustained cost savings of over $300,000 in RPP testing each year. The decrease in RPP orders did not lead to an increase in the cumulative use of other viral tests. Conclusions: This quality improvement initiative significantly improved and sustained comprehensive viral PCR testing practices in the PED without increasing the use of alternative respiratory viral testing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.