ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Implementing SMART Goals in a Radiology Research Mentorship Program: A Single-Institution Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early engagement in research is essential for radiology trainees, yet many enter the field with limited experience and confidence. Structured goal setting-particularly through the SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Time-bound) framework-may enhance research productivity and skill development. This study evaluated the impact of implementing SMART Goals within a radiology research mentorship program. Methods: Medical students and radiology residents participating in departmental research from August 2020-July 2021 completed SMART Goal worksheets and met individually with mentors to refine objectives, identify barriers, and create action plans. Scholarly output was compared descriptively with prior academic years (2016-2020). Participants completed pre- and post-intervention surveys assessing confidence across multiple research domains using a five-point Likert scale. Quantitative analyses included mean paired differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Open-ended responses were thematically analyzed. Results: Nineteen of 22 invited trainees (86%) completed the SMART Goals process. Following implementation, participants demonstrated increased scholarly engagement compared with prior academic years, including participant-level credits for 45 accepted abstracts/conference presentations, 30 manuscripts/publications, and 7 successful grants. Confidence significantly improved across all evaluated domains, including scientific goal setting (mean increase 1.54), project initiation (1.05), manuscript preparation (1.21), and study design (0.62; all p ≤ 0.01). Qualitative feedback indicated that structured goal setting enhanced organization, accountability, mentor communication, and overall engagement. Discussion: Incorporating SMART Goals into research mentorship was associated with increased scholarly engagement and measurable gains in self-reported research confidence. Trainees reported that transforming broad intentions into actionable steps improved motivation, follow-through, and clarity in research planning. These findings align with adult learning principles and competency-based medical education models emphasizing autonomy, feedback, and self-directed growth. Conclusion: Formalized SMART Goal setting may be a feasible strategy to support research skill development, mentorship alignment, and scholarly engagement among radiology trainees. Broader, multicenter evaluations are warranted to assess long-term educational and career outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.