ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
Tailoring support for parents of children in palliative care: Feasibility of the carer support needs assessment tool intervention paediatric in a Norwegian context.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Parents of children receiving palliative care often experience significant caregiving responsibilities and unmet support needs, emphasising the importance of systematic assessments and tailored interventions. Objectives: This study examined the feasibility of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention Paediatric (CSNAT-I Paediatric) within a national unit for children's palliative care in Norway. It further explored the support needs of parents of children with severe neurological impairments, including neurometabolic conditions. Design: A non-randomised, multi-method feasibility study. Methods: Feasibility was examined across domains of acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, integration, and adaptation. Cognitive interviews with parents (n=34) were conducted to examine acceptability and needs for adaptation. Overall feasibility from parents' perspectives were measured using an electronic questionnaire (n=12), and data on parents' support needs were extracted from the children's medical records. Intervention providers' perspectives on acceptability, demand, practicality, implementation and integration were explored in a focus group interview (n=6). Results: Parents found the CSNAT-I Paediatric acceptable and all domains of the assessment tool were considered relevant, although they suggested adaptations to better capture care coordination and the child's daytime activities. Parents' support needs were heterogeneous and often required action from multiple parties. Intervention providers viewed the CSNAT-I Paediatric as useful for tailoring services to families but identified practical and implementation challenges in following up on identified needs. Conclusions: The CSNAT-I Paediatric is feasible in children's palliative care settings. Effective implementation requires interprofessional and intersectional collaboration among stakeholders to meet families' complex support needs, and further refinement could enhance its utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.