ArticleSocial networks2026
The gears in network dynamics: The alter-trajectory approach.
Article in Social networks, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "An illustrative socio-biological cascade of the concentric model for health-bound networks: social determinants, social support and biological responses".Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Egocentric networks are dynamic. Prior research has typically measured change in broad network characteristics or simply in membership turnover but given relatively little attention to the history of alter-ego relationships. Using rich information about alters over three waves in the UCNets study, we develop a novel approach that delineates a "trajectory" over time for each of the alters in the network and then uses all these observed trajectories to identify types of ego networks. Results from Multilevel Latent Growth Models reveal six distinct trajectories for alters: continuously active, awakened, dormant, dropped, transitory, and new. The distribution of those six trajectories coalesces at the ego-level into three network types - anchored, shifting, and regenerative - each with unique dynamics and compositional features. To illustrate the contribution of this approach, we examine the associations between life events and the three types of network dynamics among UCNets' young adults. Findings reveal subtle patterns of change: some events shape networks by reinforcing their cores, while others expand or reconfigure networks' near and distant peripheries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.