Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42466074›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

A transdisciplinary framework for empathy research.

Kathryn K Irish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kathryn K IrishDepartment of Physiology, Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Empathy research spans the social, natural, and clinical sciences, yet its translational impact has been limited by conflicting conceptual frameworks and incompatible methodologies. This paper addresses these barriers by introducing a transdisciplinary framework that consolidates predominant theories of empathy and integrates contemporary neuroscience findings. Methods: A conceptual synthesis was conducted to reconcile major theoretical perspectives and relevant neuroscience findings from empathy research. Cross-disciplinary constructs, mechanisms, and methodologies were examined and organized into an integrative framework intended to support interdisciplinary translation and collaboration. Results: The resulting transdisciplinary framework unites Theory of Mind and Theory of Embodied Simulation by conceptualizing empathy as a process of social perception. Empathic experience is organized into four stages: (1) physiological mirroring, (2) affective resonance and responding, (3) cognitive understanding, and (4) appraisal/decision. Each stage is linked to its theoretical origins and associated with proposed neural mechanisms underlying self-other awareness. Discussion: By reframing empathy as a neutral process of social perception, rather than a subjective virtue or innate trait, this framework makes the construct more accessible to scientific inquiry. Conclusion: The proposed framework supports interdisciplinary synthesis and collaboration, thereby enhancing the translational potential of empathy research to inform clinical practice, civic engagement, and broader efforts to strengthen human connection.

Indexed as

Edith Steinempathyneural modelsphenomenologytheory of embodied simulation (TES)theory of mindtransdisciplinary

Identifiers

PMID42466074
PMCPMC13372977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.