Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42466052›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Understanding the influence of AI labels on consumer psychology: the moderating role of product type.

Xiaolian Cheng, Inwoo Nam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaolian ChengDepartment of Business Administration, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Inwoo NamDepartment of Business Administration, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driven by rapid progress in generative artificial intelligence, the use of AI-generated models in online product displays has become increasingly widespread. Although AI-generated content appears highly realistic, it is commonly associated with adverse consumer responses. This study examines how labeling a model in a product image as AI-generated (vs. human) influences consumers' self-expression. The findings show that labeling a model as AI-generated functions as an emphasis-framing cue that elevates consumers' sense of eeriness, which subsequently increases both perceived psychological risk and perceived performance risk, thereby reducing consumers' self-expressive tendencies. This process is moderated by product type, such that the negative effect is amplified for symbolic products, whereas it disappears for functional products. Building on theories of framing effect, algorithm aversion, emotion, and risk perception, this study elucidates how AI-generated labels shape consumers' self-expression and identifies the boundary conditions of these effects across different product types.

Indexed as

algorithm aversionartificial intelligenceeerinessframing effectlabelingperceived riskproduct typeself-expression

Identifiers

PMID42466052
PMCPMC13374571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.