ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
A comparative study of pitch recognition in children with cochlear implants and normal hearing peers across Mandarin tones.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to systematically compare the pitch recognition abilities of Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants (CI) and their normal-hearing (NH) peers, examining performance variations across different pitch levels (high, normal, low) and Mandarin lexical tones (T1-T4). Methods: A comparative experiment was conducted involving 25 children with CI and 25 age-matched NH children. Using acoustic analysis, pitch recognition was assessed through a task where participants identified pitch levels in sentences representing the four Mandarin tones. Results: Children with CI demonstrated a dissociated pattern of pitch recognition. Their performance in recognizing high pitch was comparable to that of NH children. However, they exhibited significant deficits in recognizing both normal and low pitch. Furthermore, the type of Mandarin lexical tone did not significantly modulate pitch recognition accuracy in either group. Conclusion: The findings indicate a selective deficit in pitch recognition among children with CI, primarily affecting the normal and low pitch ranges. The results provide empirical evidence for developing targeted auditory rehabilitation strategies that address the specific pitch recognition challenges faced by pediatric CI users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.