ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Dynamic phenotype monitoring to prevent genotype-phenotype discrepancies in pharmacogenetic-guided drug therapy.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One of the limiting factors for the clinical application of pharmacogenomics (PGx) is phenoconversion, i.e., the dynamic discrepancy between genotype-predicted and actual drug-metabolizing phenotypes. Systemic inflammation, polypharmacy, transporter dysfunction, redox and mitochondrial stress, and epigenetic modification can rapidly alter cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme and transporter activity. This suppression can lead to unexpected poor metabolizing phenotypes, increased drug accumulation, and even an increased risk of drug-induced liver injury. Therefore, static PGx genotyping should be complemented by real-time functional biomarker monitoring to achieve more accurate, effective, and safe drug delivery. Methods: This structured narrative review integrates a systematic literature search with expert-guided thematic synthesis. Mechanistic insights are supported by selectively included preclinical data. Candidate biomarkers-including miR-122, 4β-hydroxycholesterol, and GLDH-were identified through an iterative, criteria-based selection process that prioritizes mechanistic plausibility, clinical relevance, and favorable kinetics. Results: Mechanistic analyses have implicated cytokine-mediated signaling pathways (IL-6/STAT3, NF-κB), nuclear receptor repression (PXR/CAR), proteasomal CYP degradation, miRNA-driven mRNA destabilization, and enzyme inactivation as causes of phenoconversion. Dysfunction of the transporters OATP, BSEP, and MRP2, particularly in Conclusion: Within this hypothesis-generating framework, an integrated analysis of routine (CRP, transaminases), functional, and molecular biomarkers offers a novel strategy for interpreting clinically significant genotype-phenotype discordance. This approach shows the functional consequences of altered CYP activity rather than genetic predictions. Combining these multi-level parameters systematically reflects the main mechanistic domains: systemic inflammation-induced phenoconversion (CRP, IL-6), mitochondrial and oxidative stress (AST/ALT ratio, GLDH), early hepatocyte stress and apoptosis (miR-122, M30), and actual CYP3A4 metabolic capacity (4β-OHC). A PGx panel integrated with a dynamic biomarker could lead to safer, more effective, and adaptive drug dosing and reduced liver injury for high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.