Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465914›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Cross-Domain Knowledge Transfer from Expert-Annotated Gated CT via Synthetic Ungated CT Improves Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring on CT Attenuation Correction Scans.

Aakash Shanbhag, Robert Jh Miller, Aditya Killekar, Anna M Marcinkiewicz, Jianhang Zhou, Mark Lemley, Assiata Kamagate, Serge D Van Kriekinge, Paul B Kavanagh, Attila Feher and 6 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Aakash ShanbhagArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Research Center, Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Robert Jh MillerArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Research Center, Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Aditya KillekarArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Research Center, Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Anna M MarcinkiewiczArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Research Center, Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jianhang ZhouArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Research Center, Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9514-1695
Mark LemleyArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Research Center, Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Assiata KamagateArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Research Center, Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Serge D Van KriekingeArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Research Center, Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Paul B KavanaghArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Research Center, Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Attila FeherSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Edward J MillerSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2156-5962
Joanna X LiangArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Research Center, Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Daniel S BermanArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Research Center, Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Damini DeyArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Research Center, Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Richard M LeahySignal and Image Processing Institute, Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Piotr J SlomkaArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Research Center, Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6110-938X

Funding

Patient-specific Outcome Prediction from Cardiovascular Multimodality Imaging by Artificial IntelligenceR35HL161195 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI Piotr J Slomka · 2022 to 2026
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL161195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is an established measure of coronary atherosclerosis from computed tomography (CT). While deep learning (DL) can quantify CAC from non-dedicated CT, the accuracy is limited by image quality. Purpose: We derived and validated a novel method for DL CAC segmentation on ultra-low dose CT attenuation correction (CTAC) scans that is trained with synthetic low-dose, ungated images. Materials and Methods: Models were trained using one center and externally tested in two other centers. Synthetic, ungated CT scans were generated so that expert segmentations from dedicated CAC scans could be used as ground truth for perfectly registered synthetic images through knowledge adaptation (KAD-CAC). We evaluated agreement between CAC scoring methods vs expert readers on a per-patient and per-vessel basis, as well as associations with the primary outcome of death or myocardial infarction (MI). Results: The DL models were externally tested on 5969 patients with a median age of 64 (IQR 56 - 73), of whom 50.2% were male. The KAD-CAC model had higher Cohen's kappa K (0.86, 95% CI 0.85 - 0.87) compared to previous convolutional LSTM model (K 0.78, 95% CI 0.76 - 0.80, p<0.01), or models trained with only gated images (K 0.81, 95% CI 0.80 - 0.82, p<0.01). Net reclassification improvement for CAC stratified risk of death or MI, was greatest for the KAD-CAC model over baseline including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, family history, smoking, stress total perfusion deficit, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Conclusion: We use paired synthetic ungated scans to transfer expert gated CAC annotations into the ungated domain, resulting in substantially better vessel-level CAC scoring and improved risk stratification.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceComputed tomographycoronary artery calciumdeep learning

Identifiers

PMID42465914
PMCPMC13370599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.