ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Phase I dose escalation of the Exportin 1 inhibitor, Selinexor, in combination with chemoradiation in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Glioblastoma (GBM) remains associated with poor outcomes, with most recurrences occurring within the high-dose radiation field suggesting persistent radioresistance. Exportin 1 (XPO1) inhibition with Selinexor has demonstrated radiosensitizing effects in preclinical models. We conducted a phase I trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of Selinexor in combination with standard chemoradiation for newly diagnosed GBM. Methods: This investigator-initiated phase I dose-escalation trial (3+3 design) enrolled adults with newly diagnosed GBM or gliosarcoma. Patients received standard radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions) with concurrent temozolomide and escalating doses of Selinexor. Three dose levels were evaluated: 80 mg weekly (weeks 1, 2, 4, 5); 60 mg twice weekly (weeks 1, 2, 4, 5); and 60 mg twice weekly (weeks 1-6) throughout radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), patterns of failure, and patient-reported outcomes (MDASI-BT). Results: Eleven patients were enrolled. Median age was 58 years, and median KPS was 90. The MTD was established at Selinexor 60 mg twice weekly during weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5 of chemoradiation. Dose level 3 exceeded the MTD with two DLTs. Treatment compliance was high, with minimal missed radiotherapy fractions. Median PFS was 15.9 months (95% CI, 6.2-28.5), and median OS was 17.4 months (95% CI, 14.1-not reached). Most recurrences were central (5/6 evaluable patients). Notably, multiple cases of delayed pseudoprogression were observed at 5, 9, 10, and 23 months post-radiotherapy. Patient-reported symptom burden remained stable over time. Conclusions: Selinexor can be safely combined with standard chemoradiation in patients with newly diagnosed GBM, with an MTD of 60 mg twice weekly during select treatment weeks. Preliminary efficacy signals and an increased incidence of delayed pseudoprogression suggest a potential radiosensitizing effect. These findings support further investigation of Selinexor in larger, prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.