ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026
Middle meningeal artery embolization in chronic subdural hematoma: bridging surgical innovations and molecular mechanisms.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical conditions in the elderly. Despite advances in burr-hole craniotomy, up to one-third of patients experience clinically significant recurrences, and most are not suitable candidates for repeat surgery. Objective: To summarize current surgical concepts and clinical evidence for middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) in CSDH and integrate this data with our current understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms that drive disease persistence and response to treatment. Methods: We detail the epidemiology and standard surgical management of CSDH, discuss prospective and randomized evidence for the use of MMAE as adjunctive, primary, or salvage therapy, and synthesize experimental and clinical data on inflammation, angiogenesis, and coagulation in the CSDH neomembrane. We then summarize mechanistic hypotheses regarding how MMAE alters this microenvironment and highlight future directions, including biomarker development and AI-assisted precision therapy. Unlike previous reviews that focused primarily on clinical outcomes, this article highlights the biological mechanisms underlying MMAE efficacy and their impact on precise patient selection. Results: Recent randomized controlled trials of MMAE have yielded mixed but encouraging results. Some trials have shown a reduction in relapse or treatment failure with adjunctive MMAE, whereas others have failed to achieve primary endpoints. Heterogeneity in study design, patient selection, and outcome definitions limits direct comparison. Mechanistic studies demonstrate that CSDH is a vascularized and inflamed microenvironment nourished by fragile MMA-derived vessels. Embolization may reduce microbleeding, dampen inflammation, and promote hematoma resorption. Conclusion: By targeting underlying vascular and inflammatory processes, MMAE is a promising adjunct and, in selected cases, an alternative strategy for CSDH. However, current evidence is heterogeneous, and further studies are needed to define its safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Integration of mechanistic information with biomarker and imaging-based approaches may improve patient selection and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.