Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465861›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Artificial intelligence-based expert trajectory guidance in an

Tailai Zhou, Tongyu Jia, Shangwei Li, Jiachen Zheng, Haotian Hou, Houming Zhao, Jichen Wang, Ji Feng, Xin Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tailai Zhou *Senior Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tongyu Jia *Senior Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shangwei LiSenior Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiachen ZhengSenior Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Haotian HouSenior Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Houming ZhaoSenior Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jichen WangSenior Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ji FengSenior Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xin MaSenior Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Renorrhaphy is one of the most technically demanding steps in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, requiring expert-level suturing to ensure adequate hemostasis and long-term renal function preservation, yet acquiring such proficiency requires extensive practice under expert supervision. Although artificial intelligence has been increasingly applied to perioperative surgical care, its potential to learn expert operative patterns from standard surgical video and translate them into real-time visual guidance for surgical training remains largely unexplored. Here we developed and evaluated an artificial intelligence framework that learns expert suturing trajectories from standard endoscopic video and provides intraoperative visual guidance for renal wound suturing training. Methods: A multicenter expert trajectory dataset was constructed from robot-assisted partial nephrectomy procedures performed at two medical centers, supported by a standardized data pipeline comprising 28-class scene annotation, temporal phase labeling of complete suturing actions, and sliding-window trajectory sampling. Building on these data, we developed a Scene-Aware Transformer that integrates instrument motion with surgical scene context to predict future trajectories, and prospectively evaluated the resulting guidance system in a pilot Results: The dataset comprised 18,515 annotated frames, 806 complete suturing actions, and 24,897 valid trajectory samples. On the independent held-out institutional test set, the model achieved an average displacement error of 34.25 pixels and a final displacement error of 52.54 pixels, with an end-to-end inference latency of 32.7 ms under laboratory computational conditions. In the prospective training study, novice trainees who received expert trajectory guidance significantly outperformed the unguided control group across six of eight performance measures by the final assessment, and maintained their advantage during unguided evaluation sessions. Discussion: These preliminary findings suggest that artificial intelligence-derived expert trajectory guidance may support short-term skill acquisition for renal wound suturing. As the prospective training component was a single-institution feasibility study without long-term retention or clinical transfer assessment, larger multicenter randomized trials are warranted before broader integration into surgical training curricula.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencerenal wound suturingrobot-assisted partial nephrectomysurgical skill acquisitionsurgical trainingsurgical trajectory guidance

Identifiers

PMID42465861
PMCPMC13373058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.