ReviewFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Informed consent in medically assisted procreation in Italy: medico-legal and ethical challenges shaping physician responsibility.
Review in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Informed consent represents a fundamental requirement in healthcare and is a key expression of patient autonomy. In the Italian context, its application in the field of medically assisted procreation (MAP) raises specific medico-legal and ethical questions. Recent developments, including updated MAP guidelines and evolving case law, further underscore the need to reflect on the specificities of informed consent in this setting. Objectives: This study aims 1) to trace the differences between informed consent in MAP and standard healthcare consent in Italy, and 2) to examine the medico-legal and ethical implications of these differences for physicians, whose obligations have come to extend beyond clinical information to encompass ethical, legal, psychological, and relational dimensions, particularly with regard to duties of information and professional liability. Materials and methods: This study adopts a qualitative, interdisciplinary approach based on a critical review of Italian legislation, case law, and bioethical and medico-legal literature. Sources were selected for relevance to MAP, with particular attention to complex scenarios such as embryo management after partner separation, post-mortem embryo transfer, and cryopreservation. Results: In Italy, informed consent in MAP differs substantially from standard healthcare consent because of its joint nature, its function beyond the therapeutic sphere, its temporal extension, and its partial irrevocability after fertilization. These features transform consent into a complex, processual act with long-term legal, ethical, and relational implications. As a result, the physician's role is not limited to the provision of technical information, but requires enhanced professional responsibility in ensuring adequate, comprehensible, and context-sensitive communication. Discussion: In this perspective, structured counselling, repeated informational processes, and careful documentation become essential not only to support autonomous decision-making, but also to prevent or mitigate medico-legal risks. These considerations highlight the need for specific professional training in communication and counselling within MAP settings, to adequately address the complexity of consent in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.