Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465807›Full record

ArticleJPhys photonics2026

Artificial Second Harmonic Generation Image Feature Tuning with Generative Models and SeFa Semantic Analysis.

Melissa Champer, Vikas Singh, Paul Campagnola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPhys photonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melissa ChamperDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Vikas SinghDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Paul CampagnolaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.

Funding

TECH CoreU54CA268069 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI David J. Odde · 2022 to 2026
$8.2M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA268069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collagen fibers within the extracellular matrix undergo morphological changes in the presence of many diseases including cancers and connective tissue disorders. Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) microscopy is ideal for visualizing this morphology by its intrinsic contrast and 3D imaging capabilities of fibrillar collagen. To build upon the success of deep learning-based methods analyzing microscopy datasets, in this study, we adapted the generative adversarial network model StyleGAN specifically for use with SHG data. Here we trained our model StyleGAN2-ADA-SHG on a dataset of 1,319 SHG images to extract further information content. When comparing evaluation metrics between the baseline dataset and the generator, we found that the model is well suited to generating novel images that appear perceptually similar to those from our small set of training data. Using Semantic Factorization (SeFa) on the generated images to examine the 10 highest scoring eigenvectors, we found two semantics with strong correlation to fiber morphological features that were quantified via analysis using CT-Fire, CurveAlign, and other fiber-based metrics. We integrated analysis tools into the SeFa GUI to support an extensible framework for future analyses and image editing. Additionally, we tested two image projection methods for editing SHG images in the GAN's latent space using the identified semantics. The encoder-based approach significantly outperformed the Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) method. With further refinement, these tools can be used to create SHG images of collagen fibers with variable morphology based on disease types for additional analysis purposes.

Identifiers

PMID42465807
PMCPMC13375112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.