Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465801›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Triple-Phase Multimodal Knowledge Aggregation Framework for Microbial Keratitis Subtype Diagnosis on Slit-Lamp Photography.

Yiqing Wang, Maria A Woodward, Ziyun Yang, N Venkatesh Prajna, Chunming He, Leslie M Niziol, Mercy Pawar, Ming-Chen Lu, Guillermo Amescua, Rachel Wozniak and 4 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yiqing WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Maria A WoodwardKellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ziyun YangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
N Venkatesh PrajnaDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery Services, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Chunming HeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Leslie M NiziolKellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Mercy PawarKellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ming-Chen LuKellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Guillermo AmescuaBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Rachel WozniakFlaum Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Sejal AminDepartment of Ophthalmology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Abinaya KrishnanDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery Services, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Prabhleen KocharDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery Services, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sina FarsiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

VISION RESEARCHP30EY005722 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Goldis Malek · 1985 to 2026
$19.3M
Automated Quantitative Ulcer Analysis (AQUA): Diagnosing Organism TypesR01EY036418 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sina Farsiu, Maria Anneke Woodward · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY005722NEI NIH HHS R01 EY036418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial keratitis requires rapid pathogen identification to guide treatment, but culture- and PCR-based diagnostics are slow and resource-intensive. We developed a triple-phase multimodal framework for bacterial-versus-fungal keratitis classification using slit-lamp photographs acquired under blue-light, sclerotic-scatter, and white-light illumination, together with clinical metadata. The model combines cross-modality contrastive learning, modality-specific fine-tuning, and feature-level multimodal ensemble learning for patient-level prediction. We evaluated the framework on a multicenter dataset of 1,645 patients and 17,158 images from India and the United States. The model achieved 85.84% accuracy, 84.46% average F1-score, and 0.885 AUC. Site-specific evaluation showed that pooled results were overly optimistic, whereas resampling- and balance-based re-evaluation provided a more realistic assessment of cross-site generalization. Under all settings, our framework remained the top-performing approach. The code is available at https://github.com/yqwang01/TPMKA and dataset access will be provided subject to University of Michigan data-sharing clearance.

Identifiers

PMID42465801
PMCPMC13370594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.