Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465751›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Non-canonical and induced neoantigens as emerging sources of cancer-specific immunotherapy targets.

Viacheslav V Kudriavskii, Valeriia A Koss, Victoria O Shender, Georgij P Arapidi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Viacheslav V KudriavskiiLopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.
Valeriia A KossLopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.
Victoria O ShenderLopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.
Georgij P ArapidiLopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has transformed cancer treatment, yet its clinical benefit remains limited in many tumors, particularly those with low mutational burden. Because most current immunotherapeutic strategies rely on neoantigen recognition, expanding the repertoire of targetable tumor-specific antigens is essential. In this review, we discuss non-canonical and therapy-induced neoantigens - derived from alternative splicing, RNA editing, transposable elements, and aberrant translation - as emerging sources of immunotherapy targets, with emphasis on their potential to improve the efficacy of current treatment approaches. We summarize recent evidence supporting the immunogenicity of corresponding neoepitopes and highlight therapy-induced antigen generation as a promising but underexplored opportunity. In particular, we focus on the impact of splicing dysregulation and chemotherapy-induced splicing alterations on neoepitope formation. We argue that integrating non-canonical and induced neoantigens into currently available immunotherapy approaches could improve antitumor efficacy and the specificity of resulting therapies, especially in tumors with limited mutational load.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAlternative SplicingAnimalsEpitopesHumansAntigens, NeoplasmEpitopeschemotherapyimmunotherapyneoantigensneoepitopessplicing

Identifiers

PMID42465751
PMCPMC13373072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.