ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2026
Australian pharmacist immunisers in vaccine conversations with patients: a qualitative study to explore communication support needs.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, uptake of childhood and adolescent vaccines recommended under the National Immunisation Program (NIP) in Australia has declined, while adult NIP vaccine uptake remains stable but suboptimal. Over the past 10 years, pharmacists have taken on a larger role in NIP vaccination, yet their communication and information needs are not well understood. Supportive vaccine conversations are key to improving uptake, but can be difficult, especially with hesitant patients. This study explored Australian pharmacist immunisers' experiences and support needs around vaccine conversations with patients, aiming to inform evidence-based communication resources. Methods: Qualitative interviews from 12 community, 7 aged care and 3 general practice pharmacist immunisers from across metropolitan, regional and rural Australia were analysed thematically. Most participants reported vaccinating adults and older adults. Results: Key themes include: 1. The usual practice; 2. What works well; 3. The gaps and challenges; 4. Addressing the gaps: perspectives and recommendations from pharmacist immunisers. We found that pharmacists - especially in regional areas - are known to the community, offer valued advice and accessible vaccinations. While many reported using effective vaccine communication, they identified a need for further clinical guidance, scenario-based training and tools to address misinformation and emotional concerns. Other needs included tailored support for aged care, accessible vaccine resources for older adults, culturally and linguistically diverse communities, and those with limited literacy and peer forums for rural and sole pharmacists. Conclusion: The study offers insights into practices and information and communication support needs of Australian pharmacist immunisers, especially in underexplored areas like aged care and sole pharmacist rural practice. It highlights the need to better disseminate existing communication supports and develop new ones. Further research should explore sector-specific and systemic challenges, and communication needs with younger populations and their carers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.