Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465683›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2026

Older people's experiences of and reactions to ageism.

Nancy Morrow-Howell, Aaron C Li, Natalie Galucia, Brian D Carpenter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nancy Morrow-HowellHarvey A. Friedman Center for Aging, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-9323
Aaron C LiHarvey A. Friedman Center for Aging, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
Natalie GaluciaHarvey A. Friedman Center for Aging, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4117-327X
Brian D CarpenterHarvey A. Friedman Center for Aging, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4206-3117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: There is substantial literature documenting the pervasiveness and harmfulness of ageism to older adults and society. Anti-ageism interventions are being developed and evaluated. However, most interventions target younger people and service providers, not older adults themselves. In this study, we aim to build knowledge about how older people understand, experience, and react to ageism with the goal of advancing anti-ageism interventions. Research Design and Methods: We conducted 9 focus groups with 58 people who were 60 years of age or older. Participants were 64% female, 64% Caucasian, and 33% African American. The modal age group was 75 to 79 years. A thematic content analysis was used to identify themes and representative quotes. Results: 5 themes emerged. Not all older people are familiar with the concept of ageism, and some report they have not experienced it. Once primed, most participants could identify experiences of interpersonal ageism in employment, health care, media, families, and community settings, like stores and restaurants. Internalized ageism was less familiar to participants. Reaction to these experiences depended on the circumstances, and reactions ranged from doing nothing to making complaints. Participants generated suggestions for potential interventions. Discussion and Implications: Focus group participants recognized experiences of interpersonal ageism and had ideas about how to confront it. They had a harder time understanding and giving examples of internalized ageism. Increasing awareness and building skills to respond to interpersonal and internalized ageism emerged as a priority in intervention development.

Indexed as

Age discriminationAge inclusivityAnti-ageism interventions

Identifiers

PMID42465683
PMCPMC13372678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.