ArticleJournal of chemical education2026
Oral Reports in an Organic Chemistry Laboratory Curriculum.
Article in Journal of chemical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The importance of teaching chemistry undergraduate students communication skills is widely recognized, but laboratory assessment is dominated by written reports with delayed feedback from instructors. The literature has demonstrated encouraging learning outcomes like positive student attitudes and deeper understanding associated with oral assessments, alongside the significant benefits of immediate feedback, but logistical challenges remain regarding implementation and consistent assessment across different instructors. This report describes an oral lab report in Organic Chemistry II that utilizes a technical, conversational approach and addresses some of the challenges associated with oral assessments, while retaining their previously documented benefits, including the development of oral communication skills. Using a rubric that is focused on principles of the Science Writing Heuristic, a comparison of students' overall score on written and oral lab reports showed that students scored higher on the oral lab report than with an analogous rubric on the written lab reports for a given experiment. Additionally, students score significantly higher on their oral report when compared to their written reports for other experiments that have a similar complexity. Oral reports can be conducted in-person or virtually without a significant difference in scoring. The challenge of instructor bias in scoring is discussed and instructor reflections are included.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.