ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
A nutrient-responsive cancer-on-chip model for assessing chemotherapy responses under glucose restriction.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fasting-mimicking diets have emerged as promising adjuvant strategies to enhance chemotherapy efficacy. However, conventional preclinical models do not adequately reproduce the microenvironmental and transport-related conditions associated with nutrient modulation, limiting mechanistic investigation of fasting-related therapeutic responses. Here, we developed a nutrient-responsive cancer-on-chip (CoC) platform integrating 3D human breast cancer models with systemic-like cisplatin administration under defined glucose conditions (high, low, no glucose). Complete glucose deprivation markedly reduced metabolic activity and cell viability, while mild reduction was largely tolerated, reflecting tumor metabolic adaptability. Tumor models were exposed to glucose modulation and cisplatin, with or without 24 h glucose-free pre-conditioning, in static and dynamic 3D systems. Static cultures displayed limited treatment response, whereas CoC exhibited significantly increased cell death, highlighting the limited predictive capacity of conventional models. Glucose-free pre-conditioning enhanced chemotherapy sensitivity, while fasting initiated concurrently with treatment produced minimal impact. Glucose reintroduction after glucose-free pre-conditioning impaired metabolic recovery, revealing a transient vulnerability window. Importantly, in healthy fibroblasts, glucose deprivation reduced metabolic activity without markedly affecting viability. A qualitative comparison with published clinical data from fasting-mimicking diet trials indicated that dynamic CoC models reproduced several treatment-related response trends more consistently than static systems. These findings suggest the potential of nutrient-responsive CoC systems as complementary tools for investigating context-dependent responses to fasting-associated therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.