ReviewJB & JS open access
Atlantoaxial Rotatory Fixation: Current Challenges and Advances in Diagnosis and Management.
Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
» Atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF), also known as atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation (AARS), is an uncommon cervical disorder that occurs predominantly in children and typically presents with painful torticollis in the characteristic "cock-robin" position. It is frequently associated with upper respiratory infections, minor trauma, or recent otolaryngologic procedures. » Computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for diagnosing AARF because it provides accurate assessment of atlantoaxial alignment and rotational deformity. » Several classification systems have been proposed to characterize AARF, including the Fielding and Hawkins classification, the Pang-Li dynamic CT classification, and the PUTH classification, which incorporates reducibility to help guide treatment decisions. » Management strategies range from nonoperative treatments-such as cervical immobilization and traction-to more invasive nonoperative interventions, including manipulation under anesthesia or halo traction, depending on symptom duration and reducibility. » Surgical stabilization, most commonly posterior C1-C2 fusion using techniques such as the Goel-Harms construct, is generally reserved for irreducible deformities or cases that fail conservative management, highlighting the need for standardized diagnostic and treatment algorithms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.