ArticleJournal of thermal analysis and calorimetry2026
Evaluation of a new system to determine wireless real-time skin temperature.
Article in Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the body's thermal status, it is essential to determine the mean skin temperature, ideally using wireless technology with real-time feedback. Such a system was not yet available. Therefore, the aim of current study was to examine the in- and ex-vivo validity and reliability of an innovative skin temperature sensor. New skin temperature sensors, named eTemp Performance, were developed with memory and direct read-out capabilities as an alternative to commonly used wireless iButton sensors that provide no real-time feedback. The time constant and precision of the sensors were evaluated by immersion in water baths and human experiments during exercise in the heat. The absolute skin temperature values measured with the eTemp Performance sensors and iButtons were compared to a calibrated gold standard with a variation during measurements of 0.12 °C. The time constant in water of the eTemp Performance sensors was 10.5 ± 1.1 s and 25.8 ± 3.3 s for the iButtons. The mean absolute offset from the standard was 0.06 ± 0.04 °C for the eTemp Performance sensors and 0.19 ± 0.03 °C for the iButtons (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.