ArticleMyoelectric Controls and Upper Limb Prosthetics Symposium2024
BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO ADOPTING A CLINICIAN DASHBOARD SUPPORTING UPPER LIMB MYOELECTRIC-CONTROLLED PROSTHESES.
Article in Myoelectric Controls and Upper Limb Prosthetics Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrating the use of myoelectric-controlled upper limb prostheses into daily life can be complex. A dashboard reporting data and insights on real-world prosthetic use and performance could improve information available for clinicians to inform care, as well as communication among end-users (prosthesis wearers) and their clinical care providers. The purpose of this project is to blend implementation science and user-centered design methodology to inform the development and refinement of a dashboard that improves efficiency and supports clinical decision-making related to prosthesis training and clinical support. We used a mixed methods approach with a stakeholder advisory panel, semi-structured interviews, and surveys from occupational therapists, prosthetists, end-users, and other technology stakeholders. Interviews reveal clinician and end-user concern related to design, adaptability of the platform to meet the needs, capability, and opportunity of the clinicians, as well as to address motivation of end-users. The dashboard may improve communication but also could create work infrastructure challenges that make the dashboard have a relative disadvantage over other forms of communication. Surveys suggest good usability, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. However, occupational therapists, the primary target population, have the lowest perceived usability and feasibility scores at the current point of dashboard design and conceptualization. In summary, mixed methods data from clinicians and prosthesis wearers provides valuable information that can drive improved development of a dashboard.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.