Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465580›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Repurposing tricyclic drugs as cancer therapeutics: comparative analysis of antitumorigenic effects of chlorpromazine, amitriptyline and imipramine.

Joos Berghausen, Eric Glasgow, Tinatin I Brelidze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joos BerghausenDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Eric GlasgowDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Tinatin I BrelidzeDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS S NOEL · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Functional mechanisms and therapeutic potential of EAG channel regulatorsR01CA252969 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BRELIDZE, TINATIN I · 2021 to 2025
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA252969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tricyclic drugs such as chlorpromazine (CPZ), amitriptyline (AmiT), and imipramine (ImiP) have demonstrated antitumorigenic potential, yet their relative potency and selectivity for different tumors remain unclear. Here, we conducted a comparative study of the antitumorigenic effects of these drugs on three major cancer types: breast cancer (MDA-MB-231), neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y), and melanoma (A375). Methods: Results: In the Discussion: Together, these findings demonstrate clear differences in antitumorigenic potency and cancer-type sensitivity among the tested tricyclic drugs, with CPZ being the most potent in both MDA-MB-231 and SH-SY5Y cells, followed by AmiT and then ImiP, in both

Indexed as

inhibitormelanomaneuroblastomatriple-negative breast cancerxenograftzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID42465580
PMCPMC13372609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.