ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Multidimensional assessment of urinary dysfunction and quality of life after cervical cancer treatment: a multicenter study integrating urodynamics and patient-reported outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer treatment may result in long-term urinary dysfunction and impaired quality of life. However, studies integrating objective urodynamic findings with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remain limited. This study evaluated urinary function, quality of life, sexual function, fatigue, and psychological well-being in women treated for cervical cancer, with particular emphasis on treatment modality. Methods: This multicenter observational study included 132 women, comprising patients treated with surgery alone (S; n = 15), surgery followed by adjuvant therapy (S+A; n = 53), definitive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (R; n = 26), and a control group without a history of gynecological malignancy (C; n = 38). Baseline assessments were performed before treatment initiation, with follow-up evaluations at 3, 6, and 9 months after treatment completion. Urogynecological evaluation included urodynamic testing and classification of urinary dysfunction, while patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7), Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Results: Urinary dysfunction was a frequent complication and became more pronounced during follow-up, particularly among women receiving radiotherapy. The proportion of patients with normal bladder function progressively decreased, accompanied by an increase in overactive bladder and mixed urinary incontinence. Objective urodynamic findings generally indicated reduced bladder capacity, lower maximum urinary flow rate, increased post-void residual volume, and a higher prevalence of detrusor overactivity among women treated with radiotherapy. Pain intensity, fatigue, anxiety and depressive symptoms increased over time, whereas life satisfaction and sexual function deteriorated, particularly in patients receiving radiotherapy or combined treatment. Weak but statistically significant correlations were observed between urodynamic findings and patient-reported outcomes, suggesting limited concordance between objective and subjective measures of urinary dysfunction. Conclusions: Cervical cancer treatment, particularly radiotherapy, is associated with persistent urinary dysfunction and deterioration in quality of life, fatigue, psychological well-being, and sexual function. Combining urodynamic assessment with patient-reported outcomes provides a more comprehensive evaluation of treatment-related morbidity and may facilitate earlier identification of patients requiring supportive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.