ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Evaluation of cerebral hemodynamic assessment from time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using a topological network-based model with Transcranial Doppler measurements.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative measurement of cerebral hemodynamics is essential for the diagnosis, management, and prognostication of cerebrovascular diseases. Transcranial Doppler (TCD), though widely used for non-invasive blood flow velocity measurement, is inherently limited by inadequate acoustic windows and significant operator dependency and provides only localized velocity information without anatomical context. To address these limitations, Dr. NEAR flow (DNF) was developed to estimate key hemodynamic parameters, including blood flow rate, relative pressure, and velocity from routinely acquired time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA). In this single-center retrospective study, the performance of DNF was evaluated in 113 patients by directly comparing DNF-calculated velocities with time-averaged mean velocities measured by TCD across seven major cerebral arteries. Patient-specific inflow boundary conditions were defined using TCD measurements to ensure physiologically consistent comparisons. Analysis of 700 arterial-level velocity pairs demonstrated a statistically significant positive correlation between the two modalities (Pearson's correlation coefficient,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.