Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465496›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

ORBIT: Annotation-Aware Empirical Enrichment and Semantic Reranking for Interpretable Functional-Class Recovery.

Benjamin L Kidder

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Benjamin L KidderDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2039-7143

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie Lynn Boerner · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene-set interpretation workflows are widely used to summarize transcriptomic and proteomic experiments, yet standard enrichment tools often return long, redundant result tables that require substantial manual consolidation. We developed ORBIT (Ontology-Ranked Biological Interpretation Tool), an annotation-aware interpretation workflow that combines empirical enrichment, semantic reranking, and redundancy-aware representative-term selection to prioritize interpretable functional summaries from gene sets. We evaluated ORBIT on a curated tiered benchmark of human functional-class gene sets spanning clean reference sets, size-ladder variants, and mixed-difficulty cases. On the 45-set core benchmark, ORBIT semantic achieved higher expected-class recovery than Enrichr and PANTHER Gene Ontology molecular-function baselines, with a mean reciprocal rank of 0.916 and top-1 recovery of 0.889. Bootstrap confidence intervals and paired permutation testing supported the robustness of this advantage, and supplemental analyses extended the comparison to g:Profiler. In a GPCR mixed-function case study, ORBIT compressed redundant enriched terms into semantic representative neighborhoods, illustrating how long enrichment outputs can be converted into reviewable biological summaries. We applied ORBIT across complementary transcriptomic analyses spanning single-cell immune-cell markers, interferon-beta stimulation, and breast-cancer subtype biology. In these settings, ORBIT condensed marker and differential-expression signatures into prioritized functional summaries with explicit links to the genes, cell types, and annotation classes supporting each result. Together, these applications show how ORBIT can move from ranked enrichment terms to structured biological interpretation, preserving the evidence trail from input genes to functional summaries.

Indexed as

enrichment analysisEnrichrfunctional genomicsGene Ontologygene-set interpretationORBITPANTHERsemantic reranking

Identifiers

PMID42465496
PMCPMC13370979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.