ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Dosimetric Characterization and Workflow Optimization of the FLASH-SARRP for Reliable Preclinical Radiobiological Studies.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Preclinical small-animal irradiators such as the FLASH-SARRP can support the advancement of photon-FLASH toward the clinic. This study aimed at characterizing the FLASH-SARRP and established a robust quality assurance (QA) workflow to enable accurate and reproducible preclinical experiments. Approach: Custom 3D-printed spacers were designed to ensure reproducible X-ray tube alignment, sample positioning and mounting of the dosimetric tools. Beam characteristics were evaluated using a combined dosimetric approach. High spatially resolved dose distributions were obtained from Gafchromic films, whereas a plastic scintillating fiber was employed to monitor in real-time the temporal pulse structure and synchronization between the two X-ray tubes. Day-to-day variability of the delivery was evaluated over several sessions. Main results: The FLASH-SARRP achieved dose-rates of around 80 Gy/s when both tubes were used simultaneously and provided a homogeneous irradiation field suitable for small-animal studies. A desynchronization between the two tubes was observed with an average delay of 10 ms, resulting in temporal dose-rate heterogeneity. Additionally, a substantial inter-session variability (~11%) was found, whereas the intra-session variability was relatively low (~4%). Inter-session variability was reduced to 5%, approaching the intra-session variability, by adding Gafchromic films/scintillator-based quality assurance (QA) workflow into the irradiation routine. Significance: This work highlights the importance of temporal dosimetry for preclinical FLASH studies. Additionally, a practical QA framework is proposed integrating real-time monitoring with reference dosimetry. The proposed work enables adaptive dose delivery, thereby enhancing the reproducibility of the irradiations, which is crucial for reliable preclinical studies on the FLASH effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.