ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
The exchange dynamics of client molecules in biomolecular condensates.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomolecular condensates are dynamic assemblies whose functions depend on continuous exchange of molecular components with the surrounding environment. While scaffold molecules drive phase separation and condensate architecture, many functional components are clients that are recruited through interactions with the scaffold-rich environment. Despite their prevalence, how client-scaffold interactions shape client exchange dynamics remains poorly understood. Here, we develop a reaction-diffusion model for client exchange in scaffold-driven condensates, in which clients switch between a scaffold-bound state and an unbound state. Bound clients exchange through scaffold-mediated transport, whereas unbound clients diffuse through the pore space of the condensate. Using the fluorescence recovery of fully photobleached condensates as a measure of client exchange, we compare transport through these two pathways with bound-unbound conversion and identify three limiting regimes. In the slow-conversion regime, bound and unbound clients recover through distinct scaffold- and pore-mediated pathways. In the intermediate-conversion regime, recovery of bound clients becomes limited by client unbinding. In the fast-conversion regime, local equilibrium between bound and unbound clients produces an effective single-state recovery. We further propose a unifying description that connects these regimes and quantitatively captures the apparent recovery timescales extracted from numerical simulations across condensate sizes. Our results provide a framework for interpreting component-specific exchange dynamics, and highlight client size, client-scaffold binding, and condensate porosity as key regulators of client turnover in multicomponent condensates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.